When I was in third grade, my father took me to buy my brother a Christmas gift. We went to a local toy store downtown and he told me to pick out a toy I thought my brother would like. I went straight to the Transformers. In 1986, Transformers were the new cool toy, unspoiled by an oversaturated market or Michael Bay. All my friends had one, and on the school bus they would each brag about how theirs would beat the others in a battle. They were also rather intricate toys, with small parts and complicated directions for converting them from robot to vehicle and back again. So I picked out the coolest one the store had on shelf: a Decepticon called Thundercracker
My brother was in kindergarten, and my father perhaps should have noticed that a Transformer was a little beyond his age range. But I suppose he could see the excitement on my face as I ran down the aisle with the toy I’d chosen. He bought it, we went home and wrapped it, and I wrote my brother’s name on the tag.
On Christmas morning, I was so eager for my brother to open the Transformer. Once the gifts were opened and my parents and grandparents retreated to the kitchen for breakfast, I took my brother’s Transformer to play with it. He didn’t notice; he was more engulfed in the other age-appropriate toys he’d opened.
I can remember transforming it back and forth, firing the spring-loaded missiles, walking it across the bookshelves in my grandparents’ living room. After some time of engrossing play, my father came into the room and asked me why I was playing with my brother’s toy.
“He’s playing with other toys,” I answered.
“That’s his gift. You picked it out for him.”
“But he doesn’t even want it!” I insisted.
My father knelt beside me, gently taking the Transformer out of my hand as he realized what was happening. “Son,” he said, “we don’t give things to people because we want it for ourselves. That’s not a gift. A gift is something we want the other person to have.” The Transformer went back to my brother’s pile of toys, and from then on sat in his closet collecting dust.
I once had a girlfriend who was a terrible gift-giver. One Christmas she bought me several shirts, wrapped them all in a box, and told me to pick the one I liked best so she could return the others. Then for my birthday, she just took me to a store and told me to pick out something I liked and she’d pay for it. I’m not a gauzy romantic, but I know when a special occasion is being treated like a financial obligation.
But then there was the time she brought me back a gift from vacation. There was no occasion, she just saw it and thought of me and decided she had to give it to me. She was practically bubbling with enthusiasm in giving it to me, so I worked as hard as I could to fake excitement in receiving it. It was terrible; it was hideous, completely useless, and obviously unbelievably expensive. It was also the nicest gift she ever gave me. I held on to it long after we broke up because I didn’t have the heart to part with the one gift she truly wanted to give me. I think I really tried to want that gift; to find a way to appreciate it. I could feel the love behind her excitement for giving me something she wanted me to have. But I also wished she’d known me well enough to realize it wasn’t something I wanted. In this season of gifts, I get conflicted.
There are people in my life for whom gift-giving is an obligation, an expectation of family ties and convention. There are people in my life for whom gift-giving is a joy but a challenge; material things seem unimportant compared with what they mean to me. And then there’s the one person – my child – for whom gift-giving is just fun. She’s easy to please, I know what she likes, and her expectations are still pretty low. In all of these gift-giving opportunities, I wonder: what do I really want these people to have? What is “the joy of giving” that people so blithely talk about at Christmas?
The best gifts are not things. Here’s the part of the Christmas-themed blog where we cue up the whole “reason for the season” tropes. Jesus, salvation, etc. I could do that, but it would be lazy. If a gift is something we want another person to have and that meets them in their particular needs and wants, then a gift is something that comes out of our own self.
I like it when people buy me things, but when I think about the gifts
I’ve received, they are from people who knew me well enough to know the things I missed in my own life and want me to have them. They might have been things impossible to give me, like peace of mind or relief from grief. They might have been things I wasn’t consciously aware I needed, like kind words or a compassionate touch. Sometimes they were things I didn’t even know existed, like the wisdom my mentors have passed down to me. Sometimes they are exactly things I am looking for and know where to get them, as in the ways my spouse and I have learned to support and affirm one another through our years together. Sometimes I don’t even recognize the gifts I received until years later, like the ways I can see my parents having loved me over my life. It’s a radical, extravagant claim to say that every good and perfect gift comes from God.
That is such a bold thing to say about God’s presence in the world. With all the suffering and violence in this world, there are still so many tiny gifts awaiting us on our paths, little things from someone who wants to give that meet an emptiness in our life. Often as small as a warm meal or even a passing smile, these gifts are everywhere around us: kindness, compassion, grace, and forgiveness. When we see others missing these things and we want them to have them, we give a gift. When we listen to one another, to know one another, that is a gift. When we want someone else to have good things, that is a gift.
I am grateful for the people in my life who have shown me the divine spark of good gift-giving. I hope that this season I can meet their example, just a little, and offer love that I want someone else to have.
Yesterday, I had to pick my daughter up from school early because she threw up. She seemed completely fine: no fever, no diarrhea, no rash or hives, and she didn’t throw up again. She even ate a little dinner last night. So who knows.
But when my kid throws up at school, someone is by-gosh going to get her and take care of her. And yesterday that person was me.
On the thirty-minute commute home, I pulled the empty plastic container out of my lunch box for her to hold in her lap in case she got sick again. It filled my car with the smell of stewed chick peas, which is not nearly as appetizing in a cold wet car as it is in a warm kitchen. Also, the vomit still caked to her shirt had a little odor to it, too. I cracked the windows to give her a little air and I tried to keep her occupied with conversation. I asked her to run down the day and see if she could pinpoint when she’d started feeling sick and what happened. I was trying to ask her when she’d first knew she felt sick, but she heard it as me asking her when she first knew she was going to throw up.
“When it happened,” was her answer. “I didn’t know the throw-up was going to come out of my mouth until it did.”
“Yeah, that’s how throw-up works,” I grimly agreed.
We got home and got her changed. Grandmommy and Granddaddy came over. She watched Strawberry Shortcake on TV. She ate some crackers and soup. I let her take some toys into the bath with her. We bent some usual rules. By the time her grandparents left, she was her usual self: bouncing off the walls, hollering and laughing, clearly feeling fine. I would say I felt suddenly thankful for her apparent recovery, but I’d actually been feeling thankful for a while.
In that time that I was leaving my office and driving to pick her up, I didn’t know anything about how she was doing other than she threw up. I expected a fever; I expected more vomit in my car; I expected holiday travel plans would be canceled; I expected less sleep and burned-up PTO. I expected… well, not quite the worst, but much more worse than it turned out to be. And in the midst of my hurry to get to her, in the midst of anxiety and fear, in the midst of my mobilization of every internal emotional resource of strength and support that I could muster, you know what popped up? Gratitude.
Driving to her school, uncertain of what the next hours might bring, I was so grateful to have the chance to give care to my child. I never wish her sick, of course, but she’s got a human body susceptible to world just like all of us, and I’m glad I know what it’s like to so powerfully give my life to someone I love. I had already decided she was going to puke in my car again – might even puke on me – and that didn’t even slow me down. I’m thankful my child has someone like me to love her, not because I’m the amazingly perfect parent, but because we all need someone to love us. She has two parents who will nurse her when she’s sick; she has grandparents who would take her to the hospital if needed; she has a school with teachers who wipe vomit off her shoes; she has a doctor who is good with kids. And I have these things, too. I’m glad I can be a part of a community that cares for her – and others as well.
Driving to her, uncertain and anxious, I didn’t know that thanksgiving would bubble up from my heart until it suddenly did.
Because that’s how thanksgiving works.
I haven’t posted anything in the past few weeks. It’s been a very busy few weeks; I’ve done a lot of traveling for work, as has my spouse. Our daughter has bounced along mostly fine. Facetime is a great tool for keeping connected while one of us travels, and grandparents have been invaluable.
Another reason I haven’t posted anything is that, honestly, I haven’t been struck by much to write. This could be due to how busy I’ve been, that all my awareness has been dominated with the various comings and goings. But I’ve wondered if it is due to some kind of routine settling over our lives. Does there come a point when life settles and suddenly everything is no longer some provocative learning experience for parent and child? Is my four-and-a-half-year-old now at a stage where development levels off, where the milestones don’t pass by with less speed and frequency? Over the nearly five years that I’ve been writing this blog, there haven’t been too many weeks that I’ve struggled to come up with something to write. But the past few months have been that way.
I wonder if this is reflective of a larger theme of the journey of parenthood: if at some point parents settle in to their roles, grow accustomed to the emotional travails and triumphs, and find it slightly less life-altering to have a child running rough-shod over life? If so, is five years too late or too soon? And when the next milestone passes, how surprised will I be? Is this an eye in the hurricane, or a well-earned respite?
I could just be tired of writing. This blog has given me energy and hope and a space to reflect over the last five years, but it also takes energy. Perhaps I’m written out for the time being. That would be okay, too, I think. A sabbatical from the weekly task of written reflection might be what I need to recharge and refresh, come back with a renewed take on the growth of my child.
Before announcing an official hiatus from this blog, I might indulge in just a little more reflection before packing it in. If I feel this way, then how does my child feel? Does she also grow weary of the constant developmental circus, of the ceaseless processing of experience and insight? Some nights she won’t stay in bed, is so intent on continuing her exploration of play and energy. But other nights (or weekend afternoons) she tells us she is tired and willingly forsakes books or songs in favor of going straight to sleep. Children don’t always know how best to say they are tired and need a break, but they do seem better at it than adults.
Scientists say that growth occurs during rest. Muscles grow stronger not during active lifting of weights, but in their recovery afterwards. Neurons in the brain synchronize and solidify their new pathways during idle moments, perhaps most quickly during sleep. And I haven’t even started whipping out the theological themes of rest, Sabbath, and the commandment to let fields lie fallow. Perhaps it is time to be grateful for these periods when parenthood seems routine, not to mention coming off of a very busy month with the intent of resting in every possible aspect. I suppose I could enact a little wisdom by saying that I’m tired and ready for a nap.
I think it best to honor the rhythms of my life and announce that I am taking an intentional break from Shaken Parent Syndrome. I will not hold myself to the once-a-week posting schedule I have held over the past years. I am not quitting it, and I might even be inspired to return full-force in a week or two. Until then, blessings and rest to you. Enjoy the fallow naptimes of your life when you get them. There will be work and play to do when you awaken.
I’ve been feeling tender and raw this week. For various reasons, the personal boundaries between my own emotional existence and the sufferings of the world have felt particularly permeable in recent days. I’ve been more affected by the news of tragedies and deaths than I usually am, and it’s left me with a dull ache in my chest. This morning, when I went in to wake my daughter, I had an overwhelming urge to stay home with her. To keep the doors locked and the world away while my little girl slept peacefully, her beautiful hair stuck wetly with sweat to her forehead. To huddle on the bed next to her, surrounding her in safety. To treasure her warmth for as many uninterrupted minutes as I could manage to steal.
Of course, thirty minutes later I was snapping at her for not listening. Seriously, how many times do I need to ask to put some socks on? It’s not that hard. Thankfully, I checked my irritation before it led her into open defiance and revolt, instead of the benignly clueless lack of attention that comes with a four-year-old waking to a new day. After all, poor thing, she doesn’t know how blessed she is to have socks and shoes to ignore.
It’s amazing how quickly children can help us forget how lucky we are to have them. This very day, parents in my city will be told that their children have been taken from them through illness, incarceration, infertility, or death. I learn about shootings and bombings and disasters and I think of all the parents the world over who have lost their children and my heart breaks both for their pain and for my fickle appreciation for my own lovely child. Children who have lost parents are called orphans, but have you noticed that our language doesn’t have a word for parents who have lost children? It would just be too harsh a word to form on our tongues.
Most of the time I am able to move through the world and keep my eyes focused on the light of mundane and routine things, the darkness of tragedy merely fleeting shadows on the periphery of my vision. But I get weary sometimes, and I turn to stare at the blots of nothingness that creep around at all times, swallowing up other people whether I am watching or not. It makes me want to hold my child tightly, never let go. Well, at least until she starts squirming and kicking. And then we’re back to dragging ourselves around in the fake florescent light of comfort and privilege.
I’m not saying anything new or particularly insightful. This world is fragile; we all know it, or at least carry an inkling around in the back of our minds. We know, at least rationally, that there are no guarantees. Children are a blessing; cherish them; blah blah blah. Nothing takes me to the cheap intellectual assent of distant hypotheticals like a child who won’t put her socks on. I suppose that is its own blessing, that in an intense week of feeling the suffering of the world, I had a respite in my annoyance that my child wouldn’t listen to me. (Imagine that! A four-year-old not listening!)
Children are magicians. They will break your heart while simultaneously mending them and then irritate the piss out of you so fast that you forget you even have a heart. They build an expressway straight to the center of what’s most valuable to us, that One Thing without which we would sink into eternal despair. Then they litter that magnificent heart path with rubble and detritus so we close it down to all traffic until further notice. Children crack us open, in every possible sense, even as they crack us up… in every possible sense.
I understand why Jesus said we should become like children. I understand the service my child provides me every day, provoking me to new levels of frustration and empathy. I understand the mixed joy of weeping at the death and destruction in the world and laughing at the absurdly maddening details of not getting my way. They go hand in hand, really. I think that comingling of irritation, hope, sadness, and joy is what the Kingdom of God is all about. A place where darkness and light – real light, not the false glare of manufactured light – this is where the Divine invites us to dwell. And my child leads me there every day, her path littered with giggles and stains and those freaking socks she won’t put on.
There are occasions, the frequency of which falls somewhere between “rare” and “commonplace,” when my child wants to be helpful. I believe she enjoys the feeling of contributing the household welfare, not to mention the ways it makes her feel a little more grown-up. Mostly, though, I think it gives her a sense of belonging in a household of two parents and no siblings. If Mommy and Daddy are cleaning the kitchen and washing dishes, the easiest way to participate without being trampled underfoot and subsequently scolded is to join in. Sometimes she washes dishes in the sink, or runs the vacuum, or, in the weirdest but most delightful instances, cleans up her room to a nearly immaculate state.
The new chores of living in a new house have provided novel helping tasks heretofore unexplored. For instance, she has become and enthusiastic mailer of letters, particularly in the raising of mailbox flags. She has also expressed interest in taking the trash cans to and from the house and the street on trash day. Last week, she rolled a city-sized trash can up our driveway – a forty degree incline of twenty-five feet – all by herself. It was empty, of course, but still. I was impressed.
This week, trash day was also recycle day. This meant two city-sized trash cans at the curb. I was eager to let her help me, since this would mean only one trip up and down the hill. When I announced the need to bring the trash cans in, she cheerfully asked to help, thrilling to belong to a very grown-up level of helper. We marched down the driveway, her chatting away happily about how helpful she was going to be to me in bringing a trash can up the driveway.
After reflecting upon this incident, it has occurred to me that my child is likely still younger than the age that my ancestors were put to work by their parents on the farm. I was perhaps too blinded by the thrill that having a child was finally starting to pay off to realize that letting her help is still not about actually receiving help. So when she grabbed the first trash can and said, “Help me, Daddy,” I merely tipped it on its wheels towards her and turned back to the other trash can.
Have I mentioned that our street is also on a hill? Meaning that our driveway slopes down to the street, which then slopes back up about as steeply along our yard. So that my child is now standing between a tilted city-size trash can and a downward concrete slope.
“Help me!” she shouted as the trash can rolled and pushed her back. I realized the folly of entrusting her balance to such weight and incline and began to move towards her just as she lost her balance. Fortunately, this meant she let go of the trash can, which then tipped back away from her, righting itself and stopping still. She threw a foot back and caught herself, too, free of the force of weight and balanced. Disaster averted, I thought with a sigh of relief.
But it wasn’t. The true disaster, the emotional disaster, had already occurred. She burst into tears. “I can’t do it!” she screamed.
I was fixated on the fact that she hadn’t fallen, hadn’t hurt herself. “That’s okay, honey,” I said in what I thought was reassurance, “I can get it.” I grabbed it and started pulling it up the driveway.
She followed, howling, “I couldn’t get it! I couldn’t get it!”
“Honey, it’s fine, I can get it.”
She wailed all the way to the top of the driveway, me lugging the trash can, her circling my legs shouting “I can’t do it!” About that time, Mommy pulled into the driveway. When she stepped out, she immediately stooped to our child and asked what was wrong.
“Daddy made me get the trash can and it fell on me!”
As my spouse looked up me, a look of puzzlement (or was that accusation?) on her face, I wanted to shout, “No one made her do anything! She asked me to help! And nothing fell on her! She’s talking nonsense!” I didn’t say those things, though. I just shrugged and said, “She’s not hurt.”
That wasn’t strictly true, of course. She had gotten quite a scare. I can only imagine how it had felt in that split-second when it seemed like the trash can really was going to topple over her – that thing is nearly a foot taller than she is, and four times as wide. That flood of cortisol and adrenaline might not be the most familiar sensation to her four-year-old body, and I should be more forgiving towards her propensity to project blame onto me instead of the cruel and uncontrollable fact that she isn’t older and bigger yet.
More than that, though, her pride was hurt. Scraped up good, blood seeping through the raw pink wound of her tiny tender ego. She’d wanted to help me but couldn’t. She was nearly crushed under the weight of it. The cheer and joy of being useful and productive snatched away from her in a panicky moment of threatening imbalance. The promise of belonging cruelly supplanted by limitation and failure.
I couldn’t see any of this in the moment; I just wanted to get the trash cans up. It wasn’t a big deal. And of course, Mommy’s soothing misdirection (“Come inside and tell me about your day…”) dried her eyes in just minutes and it seemed as if the whole thing had passed, another strange moment in the life of a four-year-old. Yet I couldn’t shake the suddenness of her distress, the intense power with which she became so distraught. Maybe my attention was caught with the incongruity of her reaction at not getting hurt, but looking down into her eyes as she howled at me, I saw something deeply and primordially afraid. I assumed in the moment it was just the shock of almost falling over, but I realize now it was more than the threat of scrapes and bruises. As she followed me up the driveway shouting, “I couldn’t get it,” what she really was saying to me, with guttural and slightly pre-verbal intensity, was: I can’t do what you want me to do; am I still yours?
It’s the image of her, trying to cling to my leg as I pulled the trash can up, that kept coming back to me as I pondered this incident. I didn’t give her the answer she needed in that moment, although to be gracious to myself, I had no idea what she was feeling right then. Now I can see it, the need for reassurance not only that the trash can will still find its place, but that she still has her place as my child. After all, I can easily remember all the times in my life when I have asked, and still ask: I can’t do what you want me to do; am I still yours?
Part of why I didn’t see it is because I so naturally assume that she belongs to me, that she will always belong to me in some form or another, that she will always be my beloved child, that nothing she could do or fail will preclude that. Of course I don’t need her to carry the trash can up the driveway to love her, for her to stay my beloved child; it’s so obvious to me that I wasn’t able to think of it until later. But maybe it’s not always so obvious to her. My first reaction to that is to wonder what I’m doing wrong as a parent to cause her to suspect that this simple failure might result in losing my love. But it’s not about my parenting; it’s about her finding a basic sense of trust and place in the world. That’s her developmental job at this age, and it in no way reflects on my parenting. Every child needs this explicit reassurance. In fact, so do adults, from time to time.
My second thought was wondering how I am already communicating that belonging comes in meeting another’s wants. This feels like a dangerous message for a little girl to be internalizing. But it’s a message we’ve all internalized. Try as I might, I’m not sure I can prevent this introjected value from embedding itself in her soul. After all, it’s embedded in my soul.
I may have missed the opportunity in the moment to assure her of her core existential need in that moment, that her belonging in my heart has nothing to do with her utility or performance. I have lots more chances, though. I can’t overcome the message completely. It’s a broken world based where value is determined by usefulness and there’s no way to escape it. I know my own wounds in fearing rejection from failure. They’re more subtle than hauling in a trash can, but they no doubt throw me off balance just as quickly and powerfully as that trash bin loomed over her. I also know how blessed it is to have someone love me like a quirky piece of art: not for the purpose I serve, but simply for being unique and beautiful. It is, at heart, how my own parents loved me; how my spouse loves me; how the divine spirit loves me. I love my child this way because I, first, was loved this way. Those small but potent places where I have belonged in the universe are reinforced and celebrated every time I tell my child that she is mine, no matter what anyone wants or does.
A few months ago, we instituted “Movie Night” at our house. Movie Night takes place on Friday nights that we are not otherwise engaged, and it consists of the three of us – wait for it – watching a movie together. Naturally, we choose movies with our four-year-old daughter in mind. Disney and Dreamworks have supplied the bulk of these films, delivered by Netflix and Amazon Instant.
Now that we are in our house and everything from storage has been unpacked, we have been reunited with our DVD collection. This means that last week’s Movie Night brought a genuinely thrilling event for our family: my daughter watched Star Wars
for the first time.
This was a long-anticipated event for daughter and father (and, to a lesser degree, mother). If you haven’t read about my Star Wars story time with her, click here
. In short, I’ve told her the plots of the three original films in little chunks for bedtime. She knows the story and characters in the ways that children remember stories: vaguely correct themes punctuated by brief incidents of unbelievably accurate detail. (“One robot got lost so Luke took his floating car into the sand mountains to look for him.”) The prospect of watching a “Star Wars movie” was immensely exciting to her, particularly if it had Princess Leia in it.
The initial battle scenes on the Corellian corvette blockade runner (yes, I’m that
dorky, you scruffy-looking nerf-herder) had her asking, “What is happening?” and “What are they doing?” But the confusion ended the moment the airlock door blew open and my daughter threw her arms up and hissed with excitement and awe: “Darth Vader!” She cowered back into the sofa while R2-D2 was stalked by the Jawas, and she threw her hands up over her eyes when Luke was attacked by the Sand People. She gazed with admiration at the Mos Eisley street scenes (Lucas’ revisionist edits are impressive in those moments), and she cheered with the Millenium Falcon escaped Tatooine. “Chewbacca is a big dog,” she explained to her mother. The trash compactor scene again had her covering her eyes in fear, and she laughed with us as C-3PO mistook their relieved shouts for death screams.
At moments throughout the movie, she would turn to me and say, “Remember this part? You told me about this!” Perhaps the best moment in the whole experience came when she whispered to me, “When you told me this story, Princess Leia looked different.” <pause> “I mean, in my mind
. She looked more like Snow White.”
I worried, back when I was recounting the tale to her, that watching the film might squash the imaginative processes of her mind. People argue that movies don’t leave as much to the imagination, not like books and the spoken word do. I think that’s true for adults; I’m not so sure with kids. Their brains seem to be taking in so much new, unprocessed and unfiltered data that their imaginations never stop working, even when we give them the pictures and structures to order them.
Adults think, “This is what Princess Leia looks like.” Kids mash it up and even slightly question it when they actually see her on the screen.
Tonight’s Movie Night is, of course, The Empire Strikes Back
. I can’t wait for her to see Yoda on the screen. She knows what he looks like because she found an old Yoda action figure of mine. She’s heard my approximation of his speech. But I’m eager to see the ways that her imagination takes him in, partly because he’s such a kid-friendly part of the Star Wars universe. Also because, well, Yoda was my favorite when I was a kid. My own imagination was filled with stories and ideas about Yoda. Watching her experience these stories for the first time invites me into my own childhood recollections, but also reminds me not to hold on to them so tightly.
(Again, see my analysis
as to why people my age hate – hate
– the Star Wars prequels.) Stories shape us and form who we are, but we do not own them; they are not ours to keep. They belong to families, communities, cultures; they slip out of our hands and take on larger significance and meanings as new people encounter and live them. They are, quite literally, alive in their capacity to grow and change and adapt and touch each individual in different ways.
I love watching my child imagine the stories I tell her: Star Wars, Grimm’s fairy tales, someday it will be Lord of the Rings
. Or the way she engages the stories of the Bible, or the stories I tell her of when I was a kid. All these things are alive in her in new ways, ways I can’t see or predict, but that bring me back to the mystery of discovery that is narrative. It’s exciting to watch and to know that I have years ahead of her hearing, discovering, and reinterpreting my stories back to me.
Last week, I wrote about my daughter not understanding her new room. This week, it has become very clear to us: she is regressing.
Mostly, it’s the tantrums. They are loud, wild, and uncontainable. These are the things she has thrown tantrums over just this week:
· Wearing shoes
· Not being able to wear Mommy’s shoes
· Having eggs for breakfast
· Having quiche for dinner
· Having pizza for dinner
· Having spaghetti for dinner (what a lucky kid! Pizza and spaghetti, I mean, come on!)
· Not getting a fourth helping of watermelon for dinner
· Getting only six minutes of playtime instead of ten
· Not getting to stay up late and watch TV (and she’s only four!)
· Getting her hair combed
· Getting her hair put up in a ponytail
· Getting a bath
· Going to the potty
· Wetting her pants because she didn’t go to the potty
· Going to school
· Going home from school
· And, my personal favorite reason for her to throw a tantrum: because Mommy and Daddy are mad at her.
I know that these things are regressive symptoms of her new surroundings. How do I know? Other than the other regressive symptoms – she gets up in the middle of the night, she’s had more potty accidents – these are things she wasn’t doing a month ago. At least, not with the same frequency and intensity. She has become an emotional two-year-old, but with the physical agency of a four-year-old. She’s hit us, scratched us, thrown things, and in one inspired moment, spit on the floor after declaring, “I’m going to spit on the floor!”
And always with the constant wailing. She’s invented a new way to sob. It’s far more guttural and rumbling than it used to be. It’s as if in having a larger home, she knows she needs to work harder to completely fill the space with the volume of her voice.
It’s maddening. The only consolation we can find – and it’s small – is that we know what’s going on. The remedy, besides trying to marshal the kind of patience reserved for caricatures of saints, is to stick firm to both our routines. Stories at bedtime are non-negotiable; so are bath nights, morning dress procedures, and clean-up rituals. She is hyper-sensitive to routine. I’m still trying to find the best route for my commute home, and she notices every time I go a different way. She will become accustomed to the new surroundings, but the quicker we can establish a firm, predictable existence in the new home, the better.
And, of course, the love. Regression is, in simply Freudian terms, a coping response to feelings of insecurity and vulnerability. Her ultimate concern in all of this is to simply be reassured that we love her, we’re taking care of her, and she can depend on us. This isn’t helped when we lose our patience and temper at her terrible, terrible behavior. It’s a real bind. When I can marshal the patience, it’s because I keep reminding her that this terrible behavior is a cry for reassurance. At the heart of it all, she needs to know that our love for her is as unbendable as we know it really is.
There are other concrete approaches we’re trying. I’m going to give her a tour of her bedroom this weekend: where her clothes, toys, books are being kept. My therapist even suggested I let her name her new furniture. Anything to help her feel more in control.
We went through this a year ago when we moved to Charlotte. You’d think we’d have learned some things after that experience. But as anyone caring for children knows, it’s one thing to think and talk about parenting from a removed theoretical standpoint; it’s another to put it into practice with an actual child in the middle of a meltdown. We’re doing our best, I suppose. And even if we keep failing, we can trust that, just like last fall, she will adapt and settle down. Let’s all just pray that we can make it until then before I start regressing too much.
It’s been several weeks since I posted anything. I have a good reason: we moved into a new house. After a year of dismal apartment living – cramped space, dilapidated appliances, ignored noise complaints, and lots and lots of bugs – we are now in our own home. Except for crickets in the woods, it is blissfully quiet. We have lots and lots of space. The appliances are new and very fancy. (Our refrigerator beeps if it’s left open.) We’ve even been reunited with the 40% of our stuff that was stashed in a storage unit. I can’t tell you how satisfying it was last night for me to open up boxes of books, feel them in my hands, then place them on shelves. I’m not planning on reading any of them, but after having them stuffed into boxes in the back of a dim storage garage for a year, it was nice to bring them home.
Our daughter, however, seems to be a little on the fence. She’s not explicit about it; if you were to ask her if she liked her new house, she’d probably say yes. There’s a tree swing in the yard that she loves. Her bedroom is pink, and she’s now sleeping in a “big girl bed.” Her books are all unpacked and her daddy’s set up the Netflix so she can watch Curious George when she earns screen time. She likes our neighbor next door and last night we found a collection of quartz geodes the previous owners seemed to have dumped out in the flowerbeds.
But it’s the fourth room she’s had in a little over a year. It’s all new. And, just like last year when we moved into the apartment in a brand new city, she’s acting out. I’d like to think it’s not as bad. After all, her teachers and friends and school and church are all the same. But she goes to sleep in a new bed at night and the car pulls into a different space and the faces of the neighbors are different. Some of her toys are still in boxes. And as she shouted at us in a moment of frustration the other night, “I don’t understand my room!”
I’m not entirely clear what that means, but it seems appropriate. There’s a lot in this world for a four-year-old to not understand. What she did understand, at least until last week, was what her room looked like and where her toys were and how bath time proceeded and even what roads we drove on. Once again, all of that is up in the air, and she is starting over to establish routines and familiarity.
We don’t plan on moving again for a very long time. Maybe ever. My child will hopefully move out eventually, but we plan on her spending a good fourteen years in this house. So I know she’ll get used to it, and when she’s an adult, she will no doubt think of this house in those moments when her memories turn wistfully to her childhood. I wish I could speed up her getting used to the house or, better yet, infect her with the same sense of relief and excitement that her parents feel to be living in such a wonderful place. Transition is hard for anyone, and for a little person, transition is experienced as five or ten times bigger than it is for adults. We’re employing every tactic we know of to reassure her that we are with her, that she is safe, that she can depend on us, that new routines are forming. But a four-year-old lives in a world of emotions and reactions, and she is going to feel out loud whatever she feels.
There’s something to be said about just living out your uncertainty. I wish it was taking more obedient, manageable forms. But I’m trying to admire her emotional honesty. Sometimes I don’t understand the world I live in, either, and that’s scary, particularly when it includes the one place you need to feel safe and familiar. As her parent, I think my job here is twofold. First, I’m trying to make room for her that she can understand. Not rationally, but in her heart. Secondly, I think I just have to keep loving her no matter how maddening her acting out becomes. Come to think of it, those are every parent’s jobs.
As the boxes continue to become unpacked, we will find our home, and so will our daughter. May you also continue to find room in your life that you understand, and find the space to feel your frustration when you don’t understand it.
Last week, The Cut
, the online fashion blog of New York Magazine
, published a piece
by Kat Stoeffel entitled “It Shouldn’t Take Having a Daughter For Men To Care About Feminism.” The hyperlink title was “Stop It, Dad Feminism, You’re Embarrassing Me.” Slate
, my all-time favorite magazine in any print medium, republished this article under the title “The Problem With Dad Feminism” with the hyperlink title “Dad Feminism: Why Having a Daughter Shouldn’t Make Men Care About Feminism.”
If I understand Stoeffel’s complaint, it’s that “dad feminism” – at least as it tends to live on the internet in the form of blogs, tweets, and other online ephemera – is condescending and patronizing. Her primary example is a recent post from the owner of an online hip-hop site who scolded pop star Nicki Minaj for the provocative cover of her latest single. I’m not going to wade into the issues of sexualized pop culture or the vast complexities of society’s objectification of women’s bodies right now. It’s a complex, difficult issue and I don’t feel qualified to weigh in on it. Stoeffel’s problem with this tsk-tsking is that it presents as a “fatherly” attempt to control Minaj’s use of her own body and image in the guise of all that he has learned since having a young daughter. The original title of the post makes the clearest statement of Stoeffel’s complaint, and she restates the thesis in the first paragraph: “[O]ften the writer-dad’s newfound sensitivity is overshadowed by his prior obliviousness: He was apparently unable to empathize with women before one sprung from his loins. Did he take nothing from his other encounters with half of humanity?”
This is dead on. Suddenly deciding that women are people because you want to protect your daughter from other men does not make you a feminist.
One would assume that before you had a daughter, you had a wife or girlfriend. Not to mention a mother. And, one would hope, female friends, coworkers, and neighbors. I completely get this. Talking down to women because you have a daughter is not “Dad Feminism,” it’s “Paternalism.”
(And I think it's fair to say moms do this, too.)
As a man who considers himself a feminist – at least to the degree that it is possible for someone who does not have the lived experience of being a woman to claim the title – I can say that my feminist leanings did not start the day my daughter was born. I’d like to think that I was not previously oblivious to the struggles of women in our culture and whatever sensitivity I have is not completely new. However. Whatever is meant by the term “Dad Feminism,” I can’t help but feel defensive. When I read the term in the article titles, I immediately identified with it, only to be offended to have it suggested that Dad Feminism is an embarrassing problem.
I certainly don’t understand why having a daughter shouldn’t make men care about feminism (although, to be fair, I don’t think Stoeffel suggested this). There are, of course, lots and lots of other things besides having a daughter that should make men care about feminism.
You know, like a desire for justice and equity in the world. Or basic sensitivity to the needs of other human beings. Or, at the least, the selfish recognition that patriarchy is also oppressive to men. But having a daughter should make men more interested in feminism.
Here is where I want to take my stand in defining what I think “Dad Feminism” should be. Having a daughter should make men interested in feminism. So, too, should having a son.
I considered myself a feminist (again, with the caveat that I can only claim that title to a certain degree) before having my daughter, but I consider myself more
feminist now because I am a parent.
I think – I could be wrong, it’s hard to tell for sure – but I think it’s safe to say that I am more of a feminist because I had a child. Caring for and about my child made me more of a feminist. It also made me more of an environmentalist. And more of a pacifist. And more of an LGBTQ ally. And more concerned about racial equality. And economic parity. And educational access.
In short, becoming a parent – having the responsibility of bringing up a young life in this society – has made me more sensitive and concerned about the struggles of all people. It starts with my love for my child who, as genetic chance should have it, was born a girl. And from there it opens up my heart even more to others. Because yes: I see suffering in the world and think, “What if that were my child?” When I read about rape victims dismissed by universities and police, I become incensed. It starts by realizing connecting to that person as someone’s child, then telegraphs to how I would feel if it were my
child, then opens me up to paying attention to the full personhood of human beings who suffer rape, humiliation, and other sexual abuse. The same thing happens when I read about Palestinian children killed when their school is bombed. Or when I hear the dire predictions of climate change on this planet. Or see the abuse heaped on people who are transgendered, or the vast injustices that face non-white Americans, or the impossible burdens of being poor. I don’t want these things for my child, and I don’t want them for anyone’s child. The crazy protective love I have for my child has broken open wider the empathy I feel for other people's suffering.
Yes, it runs the risk of paternalism. I accept that. I will work to keep from being patronizing, of treating people who aren’t my child as if they were my child. But I will not renounce my indebtedness to my daughter for making me more deeply sensitive to the suffering in the world.
You certainly don’t have to be a parent to start caring about injustice; I agree that you should have started that long ago. But for this writer, I wholeheartedly claim that becoming a father has intensified my heart for other people. One day I will turn my child loose into this world and it terrifies me. I am not ashamed to be a Dad Activist in the hopes that this world might be a slightly better place for everyone's children. So please tell me if I am clueless, patronizing, or patriarchal. I’ve never wanted that for myself. But do not scold or patronize me for having my heart opened more deeply because of the fierce love I have for my child. My role as a dad has an awful lot to do with my newfound dedication to bringing change to the world, clumsy as I might sometimes be at it. The work of healing and reconciliation is difficult and I care a great deal about it. I will not be silent when my efforts to engage in this work are dismissed because they come out of my identity as a father.
We bought our daughter her first Bible.
It’s actually kind of not really a Bible. It’s a translation put out by the American Bible Society that is heavy on illustrations and selective on stories, with occasionally heavy-handed theological interpretations at times. (Did God really have a plan for Joseph the whole time? Or did Joseph just think God had a plan?) Whole chunks of the actual Bible are skipped completely. Want to guess how much of Leviticus and Numbers are illustrated for your child? That’s right: zero percent. (Which, honestly, is probably a good call.) So it’s not a real Bible. But it feels like a good start. And we found it used for fifty cents, so there’s the savings to consider.
She is the one who asked for a Bible. We’ve been reading books to her literally since we brought her home from the hospital, so books are a familiar and exciting experience for her. She’s also been going to church and Sunday School for almost the same amount of time. She’s four, and she’s old enough to notice that her church lessons all come from a book called the Bible. So she wanted one for us to read at home.
Our purchase of a Bible, along with intentional reading from it – every night, we read three or four stories to her – coincides with a recent study
published in the journal Cognitive Science
suggesting that kids “from a religious background” have a harder time differentiating between fact and fiction. Three types of stories were told to children: 1) obviously real stories, 2) religiously themed stories featuring divine intervention, and 3) stories without religious themes but still featuring some magically impossible event. “Secular” children distinguished the second and third stories to be fiction, whereas children who “went to church or were enrolled in parochial school” were less likely to describe the second or third stories to be fictional.
The age range of these kids was five- and six-year olds. Which is an odd range to choose from, given that it’s exactly the cusp at which children move from preoperational thinking into concrete operational thought. Or, put another way, this is exactly the age in which children start to question whether Santa Claus is real. The authors of the study seem to think that religion encourages magical thinking among children. Which, each night that I’m reading the Bible to my four-year-old, leads me to a couple of thoughts: A) What is the context in which we tell our children biblical stories? B) Aren’t children magical thinkers anyway? C) Is magical thinking such a terrible thing?
My guess is that “religious” kids means kids who are taught that stories of faith – hell, who am I kidding, if this study took place in America, then we mean stories from the Bible – are literally true. Drawing a strict line in the ground about the factual bases of certain biblical stories probably does get confusing to children. If we teach our children that Jonah was a real person who was actually swallowed by a real whale, then I don’t suppose it would be much more of a leap for that child to believe that Santa Claus really fits in the chimney, or that a prince was actually turned into a frog. Children really aren’t developed enough to distinguish between different types of magical thinking like adults are.
This is because children are magical thinkers by their developmental nature.
If the researchers really wanted to alarm me, they should have done their study with nine- and ten-year-olds. You know why they didn’t? Because kids that age, even kids who believe that the Bible is literally true, know how to distinguish between reality and fantasy. I dare you to go to the most conservative church you can find and ask the ten-year-olds there if real people can do impossible magical things, and they will probably say no. Perhaps a literal biblical education might delay the transition into concrete operational thought, but I hardly believe that the strictest of churches is raising children who cannot differentiate reality from fantasy.
Last of all, I find myself circling back to the question: what’s so bad about magical thinking? Because, let’s face it, we never grow out of that.
I don’t just mean adults who believe the Bible is literal; I mean everyone
relies on some kind of magical thinking. You remember that relationship where you were sure if you worked hard enough you could change the other person? Magical thinking. Do you eat “super foods” in order to cleanse unseen toxins from your system? Magical thinking. Do you ever talk out loud to a loved one who has died? Or think that you have control over what happens to you? Or that your life on this earth has a purpose? Magical thinking, all of it. Do you believe in the power of love? Because, folks, thinking doesn’t get more magical than that.
I could spend a lot of energy parsing the ways that magical thinking could be both negative and positive. There are lots of ways that magical thinking has contributed to pain and suffering; just look at the anti-vaccine movement. There are also ways that magical thinking makes a difference for the better. I daresay that not a little bit of magical thinking inspired Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. to believe that a hatefully segregated country could change for the better.
Instead of trying to categorize magical thinking into good and bad types, I’d rather just sit with my daughter in her magical worlds. She isn’t quite old enough to be asking if the stories we read are real. She doesn’t care; they’re books
. She loves the stories and it doesn’t matter to her if they are factual or not; they’re real
in the sense that they are stories she loves. She is old enough to ask about things that happen to us
are real. If I tell her I saw a dragon at work, she’ll ask, “For real?” And I’ll say, “Not for real.” And we’ll laugh. But she doesn’t point to the dragons in her books and say, “Are these real?” They’re real to her in that moment.
This is why I love the Bible. The stories of the Bible are real to me. Not literally, factually real. But real in a deeper, more powerful sense. Yes, even a magical
sense. The ways I find myself in the biblical narratives have changed over and over throughout the years of my life, depending on who I am and how I’m growing and changing. That’s why I’ve learned to call the Bible the “living word.” If it were just a book of facts, it wouldn’t be alive. If I have to choose between inanimate data and a little bit of lively magic to determine the meaning in my life, I will choose the magic. Because, come on – who wants to live a life deprived of magic?
It won’t be long before my daughter does start asking of the books we read, “Is this real?” That will include the Bible. I’m not entirely sure what I’ll say, but it will probably be something like, “What do you think?” That’s not a dodge; it’s an invitation to soak in the stories. I don’t fret about the day she questions whether or not the Cat in the Hat exists, and I’m not going to fret about the day she questions whether or not Adam and Eve are real. It’s not that I think these stories are equally important in my life. I haven’t shaped my life around the stories of Dr. Seuss (although that would probably be a life well lived). We all choose the narratives that inform our lives, and there’s a very real communal power in joining together with narratives that are ancient and have informed centuries of people’s lives and movements, for better or worse. I’m glad to pass down the narratives that have informed my life, but if those stories are going to enrich my child’s life, I have to let go of my need to control them. That’s how she reads stories – as beautiful living things that invite her into new and magical worlds, not sets of files to be manipulated and monitored. I consider myself a scientific person. I’m not one for superstition or illusion. I am, however, one for imagination. I’m all for dreaming, for being visionary that extend beyond what I can touch, for embracing whimsy and creativity. These things don’t conflict; most scientists are deeply imaginative, curious people who look high up at the stars or deep into the atoms and wonder. This is the magic invitation of stories: to wonder. Peace, hope, love – these things are magic. When I sit down each night to read with my daughter, whether it’s about taco-loving dragons, or Max sailing in and out of days, or Moses parting the Red Sea, I join my child in wondering about and over the world. I join her in living a magic-filled life.